Being Early is the Same as Being Wrong?

How many times have you heard that saying from the post title in the world of speculation? A bazillion to be sure and it’s true, but the beautiful thing about that saying is that it only applies to timing. It does not necessarily always apply to analysis. Traders lose all the time. It’s just a way of trading life. That’s why the discipline to cut and run is all important. Just because your analysis may have led you to be early on a move, doesn’t mean you cut and run from the analysis. There could be profit left to squeeze out of it and if you let your emotions get the best of you, then you might leave money on the table…and we all know that’s a trading sin.

Observe the following 2 charts from a June post for a perfect example of this notion in action with the Aussie Dollar Currency Shares.

clip_image002clip_image004

Now I lost money on that first trade as the short energy simply had not dissipated yet. I thought the up-turn had occurred, but we had yet to even see a bottom in FXA. Serves me right for playing Mr. Pseudo-currency trader. My wheel-house is equities, but you read enough charts and conduct enough analysis and you just feel like you can trade anything. I kept my eye on the action in the Aussie dollar while also following the RBA decisions, amongst other indicators. As some real heavy hitters were reported to be short the Aussie dollar, it seemed as if the move had reached total extremis and a short covering rally was a distinct possibility. Additionally, the political hijinks of America were going to produce a counter-trend rally for some well-regarded international currencies, and the Aussie was as ripe as any. Observe the current action.

clip_image006

If I had given up on this trade and just moved on to another asset class, then the profit would have totally been squandered along with the opportunity to reclaim the loss from being originally stopped out. You have to have conviction in your beliefs if you know your analysis is sound. Obviously, it doesn’t pay to fight the market but that doesn’t mean that the market will keep fighting you. Markets capitulate at extremes, providing fantastic opportunities for the diligent. And just for laughs, an ancient chart pattern, The Double Bottom, actually proved its efficacy in this particular instance in portending the trend change. Score one for classic technical analysis against the hyper-algo houses, however, don’t get used to it though. You’ll just lose money with that kind of thinking, that classical patterns will definitely play out in your favor. Have a look at Peter Brandt’s note on the H&S in GOOG back on October 9th. Granted, he did do the full disclosure thing stating that all patterns are subject to failure. Brandt is a true OG in the trading game, but everyone gets it wrong sometimes. Now I may miss out on some more upside in FXA, but I’m cool with recouping previous trade losses and harvesting new profits under my original analysis.

It can’t be reiterated enough how important it is to mind your stops with absolute discipline. You never want to enter your stops into the market because our algo-driven world has the ability to sniff these out and run them. Of course it takes position size for that to occur and an aggregation of sloppy retail holders may provide that size. Although if you simply cannot be disciplined enough to close out the trade when warranted, then do what you have to do by entering the stop. Again, I’m not abdicating for the usage of actually entering your stops into the broker. That’s amateur hour even for amateurs, but it takes time to learn how to cut and run. The primary thought process of the average amateur speculator goes something like this, “Well it’s moved so far below my purchase price that I might as well wait for it to come back and then at least I can break even.” Or if it’s an option, they foolishly allow it to expire with a total loss. Discipline is key and the trailing stop is one of the trader’s best friends.

It’s difficult to touch on this subject and not comment on the gold market. For the gold bugs, faithfully holding onto the precious metal and the precious shares it’s been a nightmare of a dislocation. For the “finanical-assets-are-the-only-place-to-be-and-a-gold-allocation-is-stupid” crowd, then this dislocation is providing the music for them to tap-dance on the hearts of the “sit-tight-and-be-right” hopeful holders of precious metals related assets. But are those tap-dancers early themselves? Are the people who have gathered precious metals related assets going to have the last laugh? Nobody can say or predict with any true credibility. There are credible sources on both sides of the argument for the gold price direction. The short-term extrapolation by the pro-financial-asset side is so glaringly and willfully ignorant of the many historical facts and the current trends that are racking up in favor of precious metals. But on the opposite side of the coin, the assumed guarantee of certain actions in the economy and thus the precious metals by the Hayek/Mises followers can also be labeled as glaringly and willfully ignorant of modern market & monetary dynamics.

Full disclosure: I do lean toward the Austrian line of thinking, but I’m not a blind fool. Let’s be real. You have to be allocated across multiple asset classes. If you have the means, it makes sense to take advantage of real estate values and advantageous financing…even after 1 year run-up’s in values and mortgage rates. The long-term statistics behind holding dividend growing, cash gushing mega brand companies speaks for itself. And nowhere has that been more recently evident than after the 2008 downturn. Fixed income is not dead. There are some sectors within that asset class that are struggling for breath, but fixed income will always be a sound allocation within a well balanced portfolio. Commodities are volatile and to over-allocate based on some historical precedents is unsound money management. As I stated though, maybe the goldbugs end up having the last laugh in that sort of The Big Short kind of way. To ignore the following chart, courtesy of Tom Fitzpatrick at CitiFX, is to think this time is different and mean reversion doesn’t work.

clip_image008

Can you find a better, more consistent, and tighter correlation to gold than the US Debt Limit? If yes, then please feel free to comment below or e-mail. I’d like to hear other opinions, biased or unbiased. I’ve observed plenty of indicators over the years and this continues to be one of the strongest. Actually, there may just be one that is stronger. For some more ha-ha’s, I’ll include the following gold charts by the consistently insightful Tom McClellan. The gold price runs quite nicely with a certain 13 & 1/2 month cycle.

clip_image010

You may be thinking that the timeline is so short that this correlation is statistically worthless. Well he provided a longer chart for that, too.

clip_image012

So if you didn’t read the original note back in August, then you’re wondering what the heck is this fairly tight sine wave correlation to the gold price. The answer as presented by Mr. McClellan:

I mentioned that I don’t know why gold exhibits this very regular 13-1/2 month cycle.  But I do know that there is a very real and important anchor which seems to control its regularity.  You may have noticed that these charts show a rather funny looking representation of a sine wave cycle, with bars instead of a wiggly line.  Those bars have an important meaning: They represent the distance between the earth and moon on the day of the full moon.  So the 13-1/2 month cycle which is evident in gold prices just happens to match up really well with the lunar apogee-perigee cycle.  Or at least it has for a couple of decades, which ought to be long enough to establish it as a real phenomenon.

Seriously! The damn distance between the earth and moon during a lunar cycle. Hard to ignore it whether you think it is laughable or not. Gold has been showing some constructive action since going sub-$1,200 in June. It’s doing the classic higher lows walk right now and everybody can see the hardcore resistance at the $1,430’s and $1,530’s. Those most obvious resistance areas that literally everybody in the world can see makes me suspect that the paper price of gold will be sold off hard at those levels, by whatever entity or entities you want to believe conducts those sorts of operations. What we’ll really want to look for is the buying action off those potential sell-offs that will provide insight into how constructive the ongoing move really is coming out of June.

I don’t usually provide precious metals shares trading recommendations as the action in the shares is predicated solely on the underlying asset. With the volatility swinging so wildly with what appears to be no fundamental reasoning, it can be highly dangerous to speculate in gold or silver miners. Consider yourself duly warned and take another gander at the disclaimer as I’m not an investment professional and readers bear all the risk of trading or investing in these markets off of anything read here. Now that that’s off my chest, observe the following weekly charts of two quality miners. The first is Yamana (AUY) and the second is New Gold (NGD).

clip_image014clip_image016

The reason you’ll want to follow these two miners is that you get a top flight major producer (AUY), albeit very small compared to the big dogs, and a high level mid-tier producer (NGD). Both trade at penny stock prices. AUY and NGD share some operational qualities that distinguish them as quality picks in the mining space. They both possess top shelf management. They both possess some of the best all-in sustaining cost numbers for producers their size compared to their peers. They both possess readily available access to funds for project development. A majority of their mining and exploring operations are in respected, safe jurisdictions; especially New Gold. Most importantly they have huge growth already built into their production schedules over the next several years, which if precious metals resume their bull advance, then earnings growth has the potential to be very significant.

As far as a short-term trade to potentially leverage a move in gold over the next several months, I prefer AUY. And look…you can see that classic chart pattern again, The Double Bottom, rearing its head to possibly portend a trend change. There are a multitude of ways to execute a trade on these two. Simply buy the shares and go long. Buy some calls a handful of months out and subsidize part of the purchase with a put sell. Buy some LEAPs by themselves; hedge with some puts on the GLD. The last two times I played LEAPs in AUY, before the beginning of the Precious Dislocation, I was able to liquidate each trade with a 200% gain. The first in just a few weeks; the second in just a few months. Remember to conduct your own due diligence and structure a trade in which you are comfortable and allows you to sleep. Also, a concerted move below October lows will negate any analysis for a positive move upward

As far as a major move in gold pushing the price multiples higher in the years to come, well I’m in the camp that believes it’s probably going to happen. Am I a blind follower who prays to the Precious Metal gods daily and reads passages from the King Lebron James version of the Great Book of Precious Metals? All while rotating my alternating gold and silver rosary beads in my hand to add heft to my precious metals prayers? Decidedly not. In attempting to evaluate all the historical information at hand and objectively assess the current data, my noggin tells me to be positioned for a potential continued advance through this decade. At this point there is still plenty of time to open positions and begin accumulating the actual metals or quality shares, but to absolutely refuse an allocation based on pure ignorance or ego is a shameful act of poor money management. There are a plethora of wealth managers and bloggers whom have bought into their published stances with such conviction and unparalleled vanity, that they can’t truly admit to utilizing an objective or agnostic approach and perhaps are surrounded by one too many sycophants. It all sort of reminds me of the South Park episode where some of the parents start purchasing Toyota Priuses(Priusci, Priusae, Prius’s, or Priussessez) and then loving the smell of their own farts. Thankfully I reside in a country where everyone is entitled to their opinion, but the anti-PM crowd just may be early in their celebrations and wrong in their analysis.

Hardest Time in History to Speculate

One of the themes I continue to hit on is the importance behind attempting to fill one’s noggin with as much knowledge as possible, so as to attempt to speculate as intelligently as possible. No easy task considering the quantity and depth of material that exists. I wanted to provide a couple of recent examples of what the average amateur speculator is up against from the world of professionals. Keep in mind that these example-providers aren’t billionaire fund managers; just investment professionals who operate successful businesses and publish outstanding investment blogs.

The first example is from MercenaryTrader.com. In my previous post I touched on an idea regarding the Baltic Dry and the potential for some short ideas. It turned out to be correct, but was it luck or quality analysis? I can’t truly quantify how I came to the decision. I review certain indicators. Observe past price action. Note the extremes and their duration. Extrapolate data and choose to establish a play. My analysis shared on MarginRich was not exactly deep, especially when compared to the MT team’s post titled, Tanker Stocks Have Triple-Digit Upside (If They Survive). A little self-deprecation is in order when I say that their analysis of the Baltic Dry and the dry shippers makes my post look like a donkey wrote it. The MarginRich post may have been prescient but I wouldn’t exactly give myself an A+ for thoroughness. All the same, I just wanted to briefly provide a tradable idea for readers. Mission accomplished. And in pointing out MT’s article, I am looking to illustrate the analytical skillset of what the average amateur speculator is up against.

The second example is from the Price Action Lab blog. Michael Harris is the creator and proprietor of Price Action Lab software, which is geared to the professional speculator. The software allows for systematic, algorithmic trading which is very simply the trading world we live in today. I don’t utilize an algorithmic approach which is probably very hazardous to my financial health, but I also don’t blindly follow patterns recognized 80 to 100 years ago and fully exploited by the 80’s and 90’s. A double-bottom or a heads & shoulder may be indicating something or the pattern may just be telling you that you’re about to get your face ripped off. That’s where the ability to fundamentally assess an equity or truly evaluate the macro-economic outlook for a particular ETF or commodity can provide a potential edge when going up against the algos. Mr. Harris provided a great illustration of that utilizing Google in his most recent post, Naive Chartists Get Crashed Shorting Google.

Defining your edge and ensuring it is truly robust is more important than ever if you’re going to play the game. Thousands of hedge funds sprang up between the late 90’s and now…and thousands have closed up shop. Even really and truly bright fund managers with a great educational background combined with an advantageous family lineage are consistently getting burned, having to pay out and close up. Don’t agree with my post’s title heading? Here’s some content from an interview with Stanley Druckenmiller that made its way around the web during the summer. The interview content is courtesy of ZeroHedge via Hugo Scott-Gall of Goldman Sachs. No matter what you think of his political ideologies or anything else about the man, Druckenmiller’s success speaks for itself and his commentary is always worth a listen. Druckenmiller states about speculating:

It has become harder for me, because the importance of my skills is receding. Part of my advantage, is that my strength is economic forecasting, but that only works in free markets, when markets are smarter than people. That’s how I started. I watched the stock market, how equities reacted to change in levels of economic activity and I could understand how price signals worked and how to forecast them. Today, all these price signals are compromised and I’m seriously questioning whether I have any competitive advantage left. Ten years ago, if the stock market had done what it has just done now, I could practically guarantee you that growth was going to accelerate. Now, it’s a possibility, but I would rather say that the market is rigged and people are chasing these assets, without growth necessarily backing confidence. It’s not predicting anything the way it used to and that really makes me reconsider my ability to generate superior returns. If the most important price in the most important economy in the world is being rigged, and everything else is priced off it, what am I supposed to read into other price movements?

For most it is simply not practical to be actively managing your funds. Now with the recent announcement of the dismal science Nobel winners, EMH and passive indexing are making the heavy rounds around the web. For good reason too, when you consider all the recent performance data. There is always more than one way to skin a cat and the truly resourceful(but “un-utilityful”) will continue to discover profitable ways of moving money around to generate profit. Build your knowledge base, simplify your financial life, and find that edge if you really think you have the chops to beat the market.

Prediction Record Thus Far and a New(er) Observation

Thought it might be a good idea from time to time to review the MarginRich prediction track record. Not every post has a prediction included, but for what has been put out there, I might as well provide a quick once over on the results. It’s not something one see’s too often from un-skin-in-the-game blogger-types who simply publish their thoughts and then move on to the next prognostication. As previously stated, I don’t profess to have any clairvoyance. I simply read the tape and share my thoughts. With that being said, the MarginRich site is currently 4-1-1 (with the oil call being essentially flat). Here’s the exact record:

1. TM – Winner
2. EEM – Winner
3. GLD – Winner
4. SPY – Winner & Loser: Predicted a correction in the S&P 500. It corrected approximately 3% but then went on to make a new high, and yet here we are in slight correction mode again. The downward energy is being stifled and that can be a dangerous thing to contend with.
5. WTIC – Flat for the most part; ostensibly range bound with no hard breakouts to the upside or downside since the post
6. FXA – Loser: However, may have just been early…aka wrong. Believe me, I know.

And as for Japan’s equity market and gasoline, there weren’t any predictions made in regards to their price movements. There were only simple observations put forward for the reader to consider. So to recap, 4 out of the 6 were in the money while oil and the Aussie dollar still present opportunities. Now onto another opportunity…

Once upon a time, long, long ago before the price discovery mechanism for virtually all markets was distorted beyond belief, there was an index that credibly served as a sort of “canary in the coalmine.” It’s canary-like qualities have ceased to function as a viable predictor of economic direction but there are still opportunities to be garnered from the late, great shipping index known as the Baltic Dry. Now even if the index is less than robust in providing leading intel on economic direction, a parabolic move is still a parabolic move, and one can see in the YChart below a rocket ride in index pricing. The breakout occurred during the week of August 23rd, but the real upward explosion occurred about a month ago exactly.

clip_image002

Now gravity has a funny way of bringing rocket rides back down to earth. The Baltic Dry may be legitimately breaking out as supply/demand fundamentals across the pricing space in shipping may warrant a move higher. My guess though is that a little steam is going to have to be let out first. This will of course affect the shippers, whose own shares have enjoyed nice upward movements as well by riding the BDI rocket. Observe the following YTD charts of a few prominent shipping companies (for the record I suck at inserting small, clear snapshots but the companies are EGLE, GNK, & DRYS):

clip_image004clip_image006clip_image008

We’re talking over 100% moves in a matter of weeks. Now the average speculator probably missed these moves which have no doubt been driven to the extreme by every investor’s best friend to true price discovery…the high frequency trader. It makes no difference. The algo’s are programmed by humans and extremes have been reached. So if you missed out it appears we now have the BDI beginning to peter-out a bit, and the opportunity to go short has presented itself. For myself, I played DRYS cold off the charts because it went from heavily range bound, unlike the other two, to an absolute take-off. As luck would have it, they announced a financing and thus the market sold it off bringing the play into the green before any true downward momentum can truly factor into the trade. The BDI has been covered extensively around the web for the past 4 weeks so anybody looking in the right corners (hint: links under Some Favorites) could have easily joined in on the fun, even if you weren’t scanning via your charting software or subscription.

It’s a bit tricky to be trading right now off the tape. There’s nothing wrong with sitting on the sidelines in cash while the action defines itself…but where’s the fun in that? Oh yeah, it’s in the protection of your capital and safety in principal. Naturally, there’s money to be made long or short but just to help disperse a little more fear for the long-only’s, here’s a few charts courtesy of CitiFX, Kimble, and ZeroHedge that communicate a message of caution.

CitiFX:clip_image009

Kimble Charting Solutions:clip_image011

Zero Hedge:  Top Chart – 2007, Middle Chart – 2011, Bottom Chart – Currentclip_image013

Now that you’re sufficiently scared of a major market correction, understand that now may be an appropriate time to take some risk off of the table or add additional hedges where appropriate. In a previous post, I had stated it appeared as if a 10% to 15% correction may be in the cards and it doesn’t seem as if we’re quite out of the woods yet. The big debate on the debt ceiling in conjunction with comments from bankers and financial thought leaders has helped to produce even more fear. Stay sharp.

Read, Read, and Read some more. Good luck out there.

A Quick Market Update With Some More Low-Rent TA

Well it would appear as if we are in the middle of the meal of that correction stew, so there’s no better time to use some more drugstore technical analysis and see if the chicken bones(or tea leaves if you prefer) can give us a little hint on further direction. Observe the first daily chart of the S&P 500:

clip_image002

The market’s power to fill gaps never ceases to amaze me. Gap-fill is a very tradable concept. Fair warning that I shouldn’t have to provide but will anyways, gaps don’t always fill so please don’t take the previous comment as some sort of end-all-be-all rhetoric on the ability of the market to “always” fill gaps. That being said, gaps do seem to get filled a fair amount of the time. Now if we move down to the weekly chart of the S&P 500, we’ll see one potential ending point of this correction.

clip_image004

Now that you know where the correction ends, just buy your near term $1,530 Puts on the SPY and pair them with some near term Calls on the VXX at $20. It’s guaranteed to work. Just kidding of course, but there’s nothing funny about that precipitous decline in the volume of the S&P 500. It starts seriously dropping off in June. Want to take a stab at false correlation as to the reason for the drop in volume? Allow me: 1. HFT 2. Real Wall St. players are on holiday 3. Threat of global nuclear war as the US conducts an “unbelievably small” strike on Damascus. Or maybe those are all correct reasons in combination with each other. Irrespective of the cause, the drop in volume is worth noting. If you’re actually considering that pair trade with the VIX, then get your brain checked, but also consider the chart below of the VIX:

clip_image006

The VXX is the VIX equivalent so it tracks closely enough for a bet. The following chart is from Tom Fitzpatrick & team at Citi and is decidedly un-low-rent. It examines the correlation of Consumer Confidence to the S&P 500 from 1995 to the present. It was posted at multiple sites I frequent but since I saw it first at KWN, I’ll hat-tip Mr. King. It looks fairly foreboding for the market similar to the Debt Margin chart I shared in the “correction stew” post. I’ll reiterate that I think if these charts(CCI & Debt Margin) are painting a picture of a serious down-move similar to 2000 and 2007, then they are very early. None the less, the chart tells a very interesting story.

clip_image008

Recently, Vodaphone and Verizon completed the biggest M&A transaction in the markets since well Vodaphone and Mannessmann back in 2000. The chart below, courtesy of Zero Hedge, shows the market action of the S&P 500 subsequent to the 2000 mega deal, denoted by the first dotted red line.

clip_image010

So obviously, this 2nd Vodafone deal signals the top and you better sell everything. Move your 401k’s, 403b’s, Keogh’s, and IRA’s to bonds and bond funds because the end is nigh. Get out of stocks because this M&A indicator has spoken. I love charts like this that can be interpreted in such an extreme way by the unsuspecting user. Are stocks a value at these prices? Do we have a multi-year run left in the stock market? Is it in the early stages of a big secular bull start like in 82? Nobody has any answers. Just continue to utilize sound strategies that fit within your investment/speculating comfort zone; and when visiting sites such as MarginRich, make sure to take any message with a gigantesco grano de sal and you’ll be okay.

Read, Read, and Read some more. Good luck out there.

Fear of Patience or Haste? Some Light Reading May Be Just What You Need

One of the notions I come across in conversations regarding the game of investing is the fear of making mistakes due to missing out(lack of action) or not waiting long enough(lack of patience). Bear in mind, we’re not talking about seasoned investment professionals(including myself). Oftentimes, this person is like many other hard-working individuals just trying to build something for the future. For the most part, that fear is completely unfounded as it generally stems from a person’s desire to invest or speculate outside of their competence levels. Why do people do that? Greed? Idiocy? Hubris? Ignorance? Naiveté? Who knows, but it definitely occurs on a daily basis with the retail set.

Two qualities that help to destroy the fear are knowledge and experience. With a healthy foundation of knowledge laid comes confidence. When combined with practical experience, one gets that level of seasoning that can lead to consistent investment success whether one is a pro or amateur. You may be thinking to yourself, “But I don’t have an MBA in finance from Wharton.” So what. Neither do a lot of successful professional investors. You going to work on Wall St.? No? Then who cares. There’s an endless supply of readily available books on everything one needs to at least complete the knowledge-half of the equation to start gaining investment confidence. The experience-half of the equation simply comes with practice, which obviously comes with time and repetition. Do you care enough about your financial future to put in the requisite time?

It all starts with one book, and if you really catch the bug, then it’ll turn into dozens or hundreds as you endeavor to consume as much information as possible to round out your self-education. Feel free to visit the MarginRich Books & Educational Content link at the top of the page(or click here if you suffer from acute wrist fatigue) to see some of the books that had the most positive influence on my own investing or speculating abilities. One can argue that there are better books or I should have read more economics or history or whatever. That’s true, but based on the population of books I have read so far, these had the most impact. When combined with regular perusal of relevant sites on the WWW, one can begin to reach that comfort level with taking appropriate action at the appropriate time based on a quality base of knowledge. Obviously, it’s my opinion that the list of links in Some Favorites off to the side or at the bottom on a mobile device, is a great place to start for web sources of relevant market information.

It is my experience that most people are simply too lazy to take the time to read or research. That’s why they listen to their Fidelity 401k advisor or their 2-bit Schwab financial advisor and wonder why they get average returns. It’s certainly true that just passively indexing in the recent past would have blown away many “complex” strategies, but any real downside protection is effectively eliminated in a down-move bust of the regular market cycle. Strategies really come down to timelines, so whether your horizon is way out or just ahead, it pays to be financially educated enough to truly take matters into your own hands. Building the foundation of knowledge and continuing to add to it will allow one to see value when it truly exists or determine extreme levels when potential outcomes are stretched; hence the tagline at the bottom of all the missives of “Read, Read, and Read some more.”

And let’s not forget the blue-blooded, Ivy League knuckleheads, allegedly the most educated financial professionals on the planet, that virtually blew up the whole system. I’ll never be convinced that it takes their magical, special sort of smarts to run a billion-dollar portfolio for an elite bank or large-scale insurance company and idiotically allow an excessive amount of funds to be gambled in the complex universe of the most esoteric derivatives all over the counter without any central clearing or oversight what so ever to potential worldwide ramifications. GTFOH with that! These fools almost blew it all up once, and you can be sure, the next time they’ll succeed…but life will go on and markets will continue to exist. Pick up a book you’ve been meaning to read and start perusing it. Whether it’s about investing or economics or history or anything, as long as it’s going to positively impact your overall investment skill set. Just…

Read, Read, and Read some more. Good luck out there.